by FMI
Specific pattern features related to different St/fog types:
WV 6.2 imagery:
VIS imagery:
09 November 2005/12.00 UTC - Meteosat 8 IR 10.8 image
|
09 November 2005/12.00 UTC - Meteosat 8 HRVIS image
|
|
|
|
|
09 November 2005/12.00 UTC - Meteosat 8 WV 6.2 image
|
By contrast, in the VIS image the St/Fog layer is clearly distinguishable as light grey, well-defined cloud sheets. Even in the VIS image the cloud top is rather flat and featureless, but the edges of the cloud sheet are clearly distinguishable in places where there are no overlying upper level clouds.
The Water vapour image shows only the water vapour content in the upper and middle troposphere and does not directly help the detection of St/Fog.
An example from southern Europe is shown below. A radiation fog area is located over Po Valley in Northern Italy. The loop of HRVIS images shows the fog layer being almost stationary throughout the day. The outer edges in the north and south are restricted by the slopes of higher terrain, while over the sea the cloud layer is slowly advected by the wind.
The most used combinations for identifying low-level clouds:
As can be seen, many of the combinations exploit the NIR 1.6 and IR 3.9 wavelengths. These wavelengths are very useful for low-cloud detection since they effectively can differentiate low water (Stratus) clouds from ice clouds or snow.
The MSG RGB daytime combination images below show a case of radiation and advection fog and Stratus over Finland, the Baltic Sea and the Baltic States. Different RGB combinations show St/Fog in different colours, but in all combinations the low cloud layers are well distinguishable from the ground or from the thicker frontal clouds. Especially useful these combinations become when the ground is snow- or ice-covered: all combinations exploiting 1.6 µm and 3.9 µm wavelength discriminate the low clouds from snow clearly.
09 November 2005/12.00 UTC - Meteosat 8 RGB image (NIR1.6, VIS0.8 and VIS0.6)
|
|
|
|
09 November 2005/12.00 UTC - Meteosat 8 RGB image (VIS0.6, VIS0.8 and IR10.8)
|
|
|
|
09 November 2005/12.00 UTC - Meteosat 8 RGB image (VIS0.8, IR3.9 and IR10.8)
|
|
|
|
09 November 2005/12.00 UTC - Meteosat 8 RGB image (VIS0.8, NIR1.6 and IR3.9; winter settings)
|
|
|
|
The example below illustrates a night-time situation over Central Europe. Radiation fog extends throughout the continent, but with large gaps in the cloud sheet. Detecting these gaps (for example over western parts of Germany and eastern parts of France) is very difficult with the IR 10.8 image alone.
09 November 2005/12.00 UTC - Meteosat 8 RGB image (IR3.9, IR10.8 and IR12.0)
|
|
|
|
09 November 2005/12.00 UTC - Meteosat 8 RGB image (IR12.0-IR10.8, IR10.8-IR3.9 and IR10.8)
|
|
|
|
Stratus is used to describe flat, featureless clouds of low altitude, typically less than 300 metres. On the other hand, fog is a stratus cloud in contact with the ground. Horizontal visibility in fog is less than 1 km.
The reason why these two phenomena are discussed together is the fact that for satellite sensors viewing them from above the differentiation is not at all simple. The only real difference between Fog and Stratus is the different altitude of the cloud base, which for Stratus lies a few hundred meters above ground, whereas in Fog the cloud base descends to ground level.
However, in quantitative satellite image interpretation requiring calculation of several cloud properties (such as cloud water distribution and cloud optical thickness), a discrimination between low stratus and fog areas is possible at daytime. Given that fog is a cloud in touch with the ground, a comparison of cloud base height with surface elevation can be used to discern fog presence. Cloud base height is computed as a difference between cloud top height and cloud thickness. The former is retrieved by interpolation of cloud margin heights (from relief or temperature lapse). The latter is determined by fitting a model of vertical cloud water distribution to the satellite-retrieved liquid water path.
This approach can be illustrated with the following example. A traditional MSG visible channel image shows an area of low cloud over Central Europe. After the inclusion of quantitative satellite image interpretation algorithms the computed fog areas can be discriminated from stratus areas.