Relative Humidity:
The isentropes show a very distinct frontal zone of a Warm Front and a rather weak isentropic trough at the rear. This deviates a bit from the ideal configuration and demonstrates that the Warm Front part is still very intensive, whilst the Occlusion part is just developing.
The relative humidity shows - as expected for such a conceptual model - high values above the frontal surface and within the isentropic trough area. This conforms to the conceptual model.
Temperature Advection:
As expected from the ideal configuration in this conceptual model, the maximum of WA is inclined with the Warm Front. This can also be clearly observed in this case study. But contrary to the ideal configuration, CA is further to the rear of the Occlusion cloud band.
Divergence:
There is a distinct zone of convergence in the warm front zone and divergence above. This is in accordance with the typical configuration for this conceptual model.
PVA:
This parameter shows an intensive maxium of PVA in middel and higher levels in the area of the Occlusion cloud band. But there is also a weak PVA area in low levels within the frontal zone. Both maxima are in accodance with the ideal configuration of the conceptual model although the low level PVA maximum is rather weak. This indicates that the surface low is still in development a fact which can also be seen in the isentropes.
Vertical Motion (Omega):
There is intensive upward motion in the area of the Warm Conveyor Belt Occlusion; this is in full agreement with the
configuration of an ideal case. The part of the warm front in front of the occlusion however is nearly completely under
sinking motion which deviates from the classical situation and is a speciality of this case study.